on PolicyMic
Bob 60506 Sure, I have ideas - but they would be nothing more than educated speculation. I have no intention of going there. You also state, "... doesn't quite fit with the "Washington outsider" image that Paul seeks to uphold." He'd rather NOT be an outsider; he'd rather most pols were Constitutionalists.
Bob 60506 As soon as you were so much as *tempted* to write, "Paul's support of Rangel would seem to go against everything the libertarian candidate believes in," you should have realized you had to be missing something. If Dr. Paul is anything, he is consistent. Somewhere, there must be an explanation.
Bob 60506 With all due respect, you really don't know Ron Paul AT ALL. Ron Paul as VP? Are you kidding? It's not "wilder;" it's absurd. No way he'd be Mitt's VP. Anyway, wouldn't it be delicious if Ron Paul ends up with the majority of delegates in Tampa? The REAL news is that THAT is still POSSIBLE.
on PolicyMic
Bob 60506 Sure, I have ideas - but they would be nothing more than educated speculation. I have no intention of going there. You also state, "... doesn't quite fit with the "Washington outsider" image that Paul seeks to uphold." He'd rather NOT be an outsider; he'd rather most pols were Constitutionalists.
Bob 60506 As soon as you were so much as *tempted* to write, "Paul's support of Rangel would seem to go against everything the libertarian candidate believes in," you should have realized you had to be missing something. If Dr. Paul is anything, he is consistent. Somewhere, there must be an explanation.
Bob 60506 With all due respect, you really don't know Ron Paul AT ALL. Ron Paul as VP? Are you kidding? It's not "wilder;" it's absurd. No way he'd be Mitt's VP. Anyway, wouldn't it be delicious if Ron Paul ends up with the majority of delegates in Tampa? The REAL news is that THAT is still POSSIBLE.