How School Busing and Socioeconomic Integration Can Help Reverse the Achievement Gap
Share on FacebookBrown v. Board of Education declared that racially segregated schools were inherently unequal. However, in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007) and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education (2006), the Supreme Court held that integration programs using race as a factor in student assignments were unconstitutional.
In 1976, the Raleigh city and county schools merged to create the Wake County School System in North Carolina. From the 1970s to 1990s, Wake County integrated schools by race. In the early 1980s, Wake County Superintendent Walter Marks expanded two-way busing and turned 27 schools into magnet schools in one year, transforming the curricula in more than a third of Wake’s schools. In 2000, when court-ordered desegregation expired, Wake County transitioned to implement a socioeconomic integration plan. The integration plan gives parents a choice of schools within the district and caps concentrations of poverty at 40 percent of students per school. Approximately 40 U.S. school districts have followed, developing student assignment models and integration plans based on student socioeconomic status.
Analysis
Under socioeconomic integration, more than 91 percent of all Wake County students in grades 3-8 passed the North Carolina math and reading tests in 2003. The test score gap between black and white students shrank from 37 points to 17 and similarly the gap between Hispanic and white students shrank from 28 points to 11. Furthermore, the passing rate for poor children increased from 55 to 80 percent. Wake County has proven the academic success of socioeconomic integration plans. Higher-income schools tend to obtain better funding, attract higher quality teachers, and set higher expectations for academic achievement. Furthermore, economically stable families tend to have the means and resources to hold schools accountable for their child’s education, thereby ensuring quality education. Socioeconomic school integration is beneficial for wealthy and poor students alike, but also critical to the development of a cooperative society.
Next Steps
A similar socioeconomic integration model – with a 40 percent poverty cap and the possibility of magnet schools and the expansion of busing programs – should be adopted in districts nationwide. Socioeconomic integration should be furthered as a national goal for all American public schools as a means to diversify schools, broaden students’ perspectives, and extend equality of opportunity in education. As Kleibard notes, the “betterment” of society can be achieved through education and schools are “the principal force for social change and social justice.”10 This philosophy highlights the need for socioeconomically integrated schools to promote broader social integration. A society that champions a movement toward integration, equality of opportunity, and social justice is surely in the spirit of Brown v. Board of Education.
Better High School Sex-Ed Classes Can Curb Rise in Teen Pregnancy and STDs
By Nora Blalock
I am a senior at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, majoring in Political Science and Women's Studies. I am involved in the Education Center of UNC's chapter of…
Mayor Bloomberg Should Fund College Mentorship Programs to Help High School Students
By Angela Choi
Angela is a student at the City College of New York studying political science and public policy. She is the Policy Director for Education for the Roosevelt Institute Campus Network Cha…
How School Busing and Socioeconomic Integration Can Help Reverse the Achievement Gap
By Colleen Connolly
…
How Washington Can Make College Affordable for Everyone and End Tuition Hikes
By Lily Roberts
Lily graduated in May from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where she majored in Peace, War & Defense and English. At UNC, she led UNC’s Roosevelt Institute, an un…
Combating Childhood Malnutrition for Low-Income Families in America's Public Schools
By Zealan Hoover
…
How North Carolina Can Make College More Affordable
By Kate Matthews
…
Al Franken's Student Non-Discrimination Act (SNDA) Will Protect LGBT Students
By Jessica Morris
Jessica Morris is a student at Mount Holyoke College and is the Deputy Director at her chapter for the Roosevelt Institute | Chapter Network. …
How North Carolina Suppresses African-American Voter Turnout
By Anna Peterson
…
How North Carolina Can Ensure Every Student Receives a Good Education
By Grace Tatter
…
These nine articles are part of the Roosevelt Institute's 10 ideas competition, in the category of Education. Mic the best policy proposal. Prizes for the winner.
Loading Comments