As NATO adapts to new security and global challenges in the post-Cold War world, a nationwide poll of university students will help the organization redefine its role and relevance.
This piece was co-authored with Anna Moore, Jenny Zeng, Sofia Knutsson, and Avery Jones
Founded in 1949, the North Atlantic Treaty Alliance (NATO) weighed heavily on the politics of the Cold War, serving as a deterrent to Soviet military force in Europe, as well as a bargaining chip towards the end of the Soviet Union. Since the fall of the USSR, though, NATO’s role in preserving American and European security has seemed less obvious to some observers. As instances of major interstate war decline, small-scale civil wars, counter-terrorism initiatives, and humanitarian crises have become far more frequent.
Though very different in nature, the intervention in Libya and the Afghanistan War both represent a departure from NATO’s traditional role and served as recognition of this new trend in warfare. NATO is forced to evaluate its future role in the aftermath of these new trends and will redefine its future mission. As the debate surrounding NATO’s continued relevance regarding American security concerns, a poll should be taken to determine its future role and status within American foreign policy.
Analysis
NATO can and should make itself relevant in the post-Cold War world through occasional, targeted military intervention. We caution that this should by no means become a frequent role or one that supersedes treaty obligations amongst member states. Rather, NATO should only intervene in conflicts that threaten international security or appear egregious from a humanitarian perspective. This view is favored because there is a need for more traditional military intervention in political and humanitarian crises. Unlike the United Nations, which does much to provide aid and neutral peacekeeping, NATO responds quickly and effectively to military conflicts, best exemplified by the Libyan no-fly zone during the revolution.
A multi-state military coalition intervened on behalf of the National Transitional Council in the 2011 Libyan Civil War, with a fair degree of success. As the world sees more civil wars, political crises, and humanitarian crises, the need for this kind of intervention will only grow. By working with the UN, as NATO did during the Libyan intervention, it can achieve military success under the auspices of the international community. To continue this cooperation, NATO member states should meet to discuss the feasibility of assuming a more central role in other, similar conflicts.
Next Steps
Through a partnership with NATO and the Atlantic Council, the Yale Security and Foreign Policy Center will work to create and disseminate an important poll asking questions such as: “Some people say that NATO is essential to American security, while others disagree. Do you believe NATO is essential or unessential to American security?” Among others, this question will help gauge future leaders’ opinions of NATO. The poll will measure American college students’ attitudes toward NATO and its continued relevance in the post-Cold War world. By coordinating with Roosevelt Institute Campus Network chapters and other politically inclined student organizations, the poll will be sent to various American college campuses throughout the United States. This method of dissemination will ensure the results are particularly reflective of politically inclined college students. This specific data is especially useful and relevant because it reflects the opinions of those future leaders in politics, the military, and the media who will play key roles in determining America’s relationship with NATO.
State Department Should Use Education Exchange Programs to Promote Peace
By Tahsin Chowdhury
Tahsin Chowdhury is a rising senior in the City College of New York studying International Studies Concentrating on International Relations. He has been a long affiliate of the Roosevel…
China Rising: How to Prevent a Naval War Between the U.S. and China
By Erich Helmreich
…
America Should Stop Giving $2 Billion of U.S. Aid to Egypt Unconditionally
By Graham Palmer
…
Chicago NATO Summit 2012: How NATO Can Become Relevant Again
By Daniel Pitcairn
I am a rising Senior at Yale University majoring in Global Affairs with a focus on international security and American foreign policy. I aspire to join the Foreign Service after gradua…
Female Military Veterans Suffering From PTSD, Sexual Assault
By Lily Roberts
Lily graduated in May from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where she majored in Peace, War & Defense and English. At UNC, she led UNC’s Roosevelt Institute, an un…
Why the U.S. Must Ratify the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty
By Ariana Rowberry
I am a rising senior attending the University of North-Carolina at Chapel Hill. My majors are Peace, War, and Defense, and Political Science.…
Most Africans Still Live on Less Than $2 a Day, Here's What the U.S. Can Do
By Erika Solanki
Graduated UCLA summa cum laude in March 2012, with departmental honors and the college honors program with a BA in International Development (South Asian concentration) and minor in Pub…
How Rap and American Music Can Defeat Al Qaeda in the Middle East
By Kyle Villemain
…
How the U.S. Can Save Mothers in Poor Countries
By Corinne White
Junior public policy and history double major at UNC-Chapel Hill.…
These nine articles are part of the Roosevelt Institute's 10 ideas competition, in the category of Defense & Diplomacy. Mic the best policy proposal. Prizes for the winner.
Loading Comments