Efforts to treat the third of Americans who are obese are futile until we train key actors in medical academies to effectively handle obesity management.
The catastrophic emergence of obesity as a public health challenge is as well-documented as it is perplexing. The incidence of obesity grew from a problematic 15 percent in 1980 to an epidemic 34 percent of the population in 2008. Not only is obesity a prominent risk factor for co-morbidities that run the gamut from diabetes to stroke to hypertension to cardiovascular disease, it also presents economic and national security challenges.
Most obesity policies today come in the form of prevention, in response to obesity treatment policy of the past focusing on “individual behavior change.” Realizing that the effort to educate obesity out of existence is ultimately futile, most policy is now fashioned to prevent obesity by changing the built environment to incentivize healthy decision-making. However, the effort to prevent obesity eclipses, and ironically prevents, the passage of policies to treat currently existing obesity. As more than a third of Americans are presently obese, this represents a dangerously large blind spot in the policy environment.
A recent ruling to include obesity treatment (in the form of screening and counseling) under Medicare is a step in the right direction. But even this step may be misplaced. While it will soon be incumbent upon a network of doctors, nurses, and other medical actors to engage obesity amongst their patients, few of these actors are prepared to do so. Indeed, 44 percent of doctors report not feeling qualified to treat obesity.
Medicare currently subsidizes the largest fraction of federal outlays to Graduate Medical Education (GME) at an annual $9.2 billion. These payments are designed to provide commensurate support for the supply side of the medical industry as Medicare works to make medical care more accessible, a move that increases demand for medical services. Given the increasing pool of insured Americans via the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), it is projected that by the year 2015, nearly half the 28,500-person shortage in physicians will be of primary care doctors.8 Finally, the direct payments go toward teaching hospitals, which decide (with little recourse) how the funds will be used to train medical students. As a result, GME payments are partly responsible for the underproduction of primary care physicians in response to the highly lucrative payment schedules to specialists. Obesity is a disease first screened and then managed by primary care physicians. With obesity soon to come under expanded coverage via the recent rule change and the PPACA, the projected shortage of physicians is a projected catastrophe for health care management.
The Decision Memo released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services outlined the key actors, methods, and assessments necessary to the inclusion of Intensive Behavioral Therapy for Obesity under Part A and Part B of Medicare. Where the memo found screening, dietary assessment, and intensive behavioral counseling to be the therapies of choice, it also noted that this therapy would be administered in a primary care setting, be that delivered through physician, nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist, or physician assistant. With the use of team-based care eminent in the PPACA, it stands to reason that obesity treatment can be a shared enterprise both in the primary care setting and the funding model.
Federal outlays to GME should promote team-based care with respect to obesity. This can be accomplished in an already-existing funding scheme; where GME payments through block grants to states are currently unburdened by few requirements, a proportion of funds can be formally allocated to training primary care teams, rather than specializing individuals, in the management of chronic diseases. Team-based care is likely to lift the burden of perceived ignorance among physicians, reduce the barrier to obesity treatment, and concurrently improve accountability in federally supported medicine.
Smoking Kills, So Let's Ban Tobacco From U.S. Pharmacies and Supermarkets
By Rahoul Ahuja
Undergrad at University of South Carolina studying Global Health Policy…
Big Government Stifles Biomedical Research
By Rahul Rekhi
A junior at Rice University studying for a B.S. in Bioengineering and a B.A. in Economics, Rahul is interested in exploring the nexus of health, science, and policy. He has conducted bi…
Medicare is Woefully Lacking for Seniors Who Want it Most
By Wilson Parker
Wilson Parker is an Economics major at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where he serves on the Executive Board of the Roosevelt Institute, and undergraduate think tank. …
Why America is Not Prepared to Treat Our Obesity Crisis
By Rajiv Narayan
Rajiv Narayan is a Research Assistant at Social Policy Research Associates who also contributes to Technical Assistance and Training projects. He was a Regents Scholar at the University…
Obamacare Affordable Care Organizations Should Be Expanded Across the U.S.
By Kate Lawrenz
Medicare and Medicaid Reforms That Can Help Curb Costs
By Adam Jutha
Canadian studying Public Health - Health Policy and Management at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Member of the Student Board of Advisors at the Roosevelt Institute | …
AIDS in Africa: Millions of Deaths Could Be Prevented
By Maggie Jacobi
Intern at the Roosevelt Institute Campus Network Student at Mount Holyoke College …
How Georgia Athens-Clark County Can Improve Health Care for Poor Resident
By Smitha Ganeshan
I am a second-year Biochemistry and Anthropology student at the University of Georgia with interests in public health, health policy, and women and children's health. …
Illegal Immigrants Deserve Health Care, Too
By Rachel Burns
Rachel Burns is a junior at the University of North Carolina studying Anthropology and Biology. …
How Medical Schools Are Failing to Teach Genetics
By Sima Sharara