Rihanna 'Birthday Cake' Remix Featuring Chris Brown Challenges Our View of Victims of Domestic Violence [Audio]

11
Rihanna, Birthday, Cake, Remix, Featuring, Chris, Brown, Domestic, Violence,

Rihanna in concert in her controversial, bondage-esque garb.

Share on Facebook

With the release of Rihanna 'Birthday Cake' remix featuring Chris Brown, rumors have been spreading across the Internet like wildfire. Like her popular hit, S&M, the song 'Birthday Cake' is very provocative and explicit. Her fans enjoy these club hits and I personally don’t mind (though I wouldn’t want my little sister listening to it, and let’s face it, she is definitely going to hear it). These songs can be seen as female sexual empowerment or, as NPR writer Ann Powers notes, “rebellious self-determination.”

Any way you cut it, Rihanna is doing what artists do: Pushing the limits and challenging society’s notions of sexuality. Elvis himself provoked scathing criticism and protests with his gyrating hips. The song alone, though, is not the problem; Rihanna's decision to include Brown on the remix is.

Three years after their horrific domestic violence incident, the public hasn’t seemed to particularly let up and nor should they. The Grammy’s received criticism for allowing Chris Brown to perform, and Rihanna got flack for having a Chris Brown look alike in her “We Found Love” video. This remix is either a complete disregard of public criticism or an active rejection of it.

I personally would have liked a more productive reaction on the part of these two artists to create awareness of the problems of domestic violence within their fan bases. I think it is irresponsible to be a public figure and not set an example for society and for your fans, but whether I like it or not, they do not technically have to do so. 

Rihanna's 'Birthday Cake' Remix Featuring Chris Brown



The expectations set on Rihanna to ‘act live a victim’ are especially unnerving. Her behavior until now, and her albums "Rated R," “Loud,”  and now her single “Birthday Cake” display the polar opposite reaction of how society expected her to respond. But this herein lies the major problem: As a society we have no right to force survivors of domestic violence, male or female, to behave in a particular way.

We live in a victim-blaming society. If Rihanna isn’t getting blasted on Twitter for ‘causing’ Chris Brown to hit her, bloggers are getting mad that she’s not speaking out about the violence. If people aren’t infuriated at her singing about bondage, they are mad that she’s even in the same room as Chris Brown, nonetheless making a song with him.

Rihanna has actively rejected the image of victim and I respect that about her. She is a young woman who is exploring her sexuality through her music like many artists have done before her. As a woman and especially as a survivor of domestic violence, she isn’t obligated to sing about self-empowerment. It would be nice to have an advocate with such influence on the younger generations of women but it is as much of an injustice to require her to do so. It’s her choice as an artist, and I would go further to say that these same expectations aren’t placed on male artists.

Women are harshly criticized and victimized if they stay with their abusers. Society dictates when women need to confront their abuser and how they should respond, and if they don’t, the violence is subsequently all their fault. I am not promoting domestic violence and I’m not encouraging women to stay with their abusers but I think they are the ones who decide when, how and if they even want to leave. Society as a whole has a hard time understanding this seemingly simple concept but fortunately there are a few who are hitting social media sites like Twitter and Facebook acknowledging that the only person allowed to decide how Rihanna should respond to abuse, is in fact, Rihanna herself.

We need to re-examine how we understand domestic violence, abusers, and victims. Even such binary, extreme assignments of labels such as ‘victim’ and ‘abuser’ don’t accurately portray the complexity of the relationship and the nature of the individuals involved. Before we can help ‘abusers’ or ‘victims,’ we need to allow ourselves to understand and accept this complexity. We need to get to the root causes of abuse and change how we, as a society, contribute to this trend instead of taking the easy road and placing blame.  

For productive dialogue, we need to be more encouraging and accepting of survivors, male or female, who choose forgiveness over hatred, or who are not ready to confront abuse. On the flip side, we need to actually encourage forgiveness and leave space for change for abusers, male or female. Domestic violence shouldn’t be something we only talk about after incidents of violence. We need to confront behaviors of control and abuse, and challenge notions of gender and subjugation in all of our relationships.

Photo Credit: MiKeARB

Share on Facebook
11

Sign up to join the discussion

Reply to this article
view profile

Justine Gonzalez

Justine Gonzalez has her BA in Sociology and Spanish from Smith College. While at Smith, she was a Mellon Mays Undergraduate Fellow which allowed...

Most Mic'd Response

weekly-winner-headshot-fpo

Angela Duffy

The reason that society expects domestic violence victims to leave their abusers is because they should! Most people remain in dangerous circumstances because they feel like there is no way out; to have the support of society at large is one small way that we can encourage victims to leave a horrible situation. It is right to have these societal norms and pressures because they can save lives and help victims heal in most instances. People do need time to heal but they cannot heal if they remain in an abusive relationship. Of course it's the victim's choice, but societal ambivalence should not be promoted as it would send the wrong message to millions of men and women.

Watch the PolicyMic Video Join PolicyMic

The Discussion

I know this article is making the claim that Rhianna is just doing her thing and "getting over it" but from what I've read about the story, and the patterns I see, it looks more to me that part of Rhianna still wants to be with Chris Brown, perhaps all the people telling the story are spinning it that way to sell papers, since Americans love drama, but this doesn't look like female empowerment, it looks like someone who despite being abused, still wants to stay in the abusive relationship, which is a much, much, more normal turn of events. Probably why its more believable to me than the notion that Rhianna has miraculously gotten over something traumatic where a thousand other girls in her position failed. The Famous are people too.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

1 Replies

  • Justine Gonzalez 3 months ago The article isn't making the c...

The article isn't making the claim that Rihanna is just doing her thing and getting over it--I'm making the claim that no matter what she decides to do that the public should support her and not further victimize her. I never claimed that she miraculously got over a traumatic experience, instead that our unforgiving judgement of victims of domestic violence is also traumatizing.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

The reason that society expects domestic violence victims to leave their abusers is because they should! Most people remain in dangerous circumstances because they feel like there is no way out; to have the support of society at large is one small way that we can encourage victims to leave a horrible situation.

It is right to have these societal norms and pressures because they can save lives and help victims heal in most instances. People do need time to heal but they cannot heal if they remain in an abusive relationship.

Of course it's the victim's choice, but societal ambivalence should not be promoted as it would send the wrong message to millions of men and women.

  • Mic this! 5
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

4 Replies

  • Justine Gonzalez 3 months ago I in no shape or form promoted ambi...

  • Jesse Merkel 3 months ago Amen sista. Isn't it funny wha...

I in no shape or form promoted ambivalence in this article. Of course victims need the support of a society but why do you feel the only way to support them is by pressuring them to behave in a way that you feel they should? That's another form of control -- to say you won't have my support unless you do as I say. Leaving isn't the end all be all to ending a domestic violence situation because the woman may go ahead and get into another similar situation. That may be what she's conditioned to look for and that needs to be addressed too. Leaving is great start for most, if not, all women -- and personally, I would tell a friend to do so if she asked me for advice -- but as a society, it shouldn't be the only, exclusive thing that we promote.

  • Mic this! 2
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

2 Replies

  • Angela Duffy 3 months ago Society's support of these wom...

Society's support of these women and men in their leaving or not leaving would look a lot like ambivalence in its practical application. Indiscriminate support of victims who remain in dangerous and violent situations would promote the misperception that domestic abuse (and toleration by victims) is acceptable.

While your thesis takes a nuanced and individualized look at the paradigm of parties in domestic abuse cases (which is very interesting and informative), it is a less pragmatic perspective. I think that the societal expectation I am in favor of is positive because it promotes a "no tolerance" discourse.

Further, it is usually only when the victim leaves a situation that they can seek the help you so correctly mention they need.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

1 Replies

  • Justine Gonzalez 3 months ago I don't think indiscriminte su...

I don't think indiscriminte support is ambivalent in practical application at all. I worked for a domestic violence organization that practiced this very approach--Safe Passage has a shelter for those that left and personal counseling and support for even those who didn't leave--men and women survivors. They help women recognize the patterns and cycles of abuse and help them identify their own behaviors as well. The key is to promote a discourse of self empowerment and that can be done with even those victims who don't leave immediately.

A no tolerance discourse does have positive results but it shouldn't be the only one--its the easiest but not the only paragmatic approach.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Amen sista. Isn't it funny what people forgive people for and what they crucify them for? Don Imus is still the devil for an off color and somewhat tasteless joke, but Chris Brown tries to cave in a 100 lb girls head and he's forgiven and winning awards. Maybe it's weird to compare the two, but I don't care really lol.

So he's a good singer and dancer. So what!? I work with young boys who are abusive on this level, and let me tell you, it's not too cynical to say that sometimes remorse is only shown when it's convenient to garner sympathy.

Brown had a chance to show a good side, and instead of broke a window at GMA. But thats okay - The ladies on the view forgive him!! Ugh!

  • Mic this! 3
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

I hope she doesn't start hanging around this guy again a lot in person. Forgiveness is one thing, but he cracked her head several times against a window, told her he would kill her and left her forehead bruised and swollen. You know how hard you have to hit to swell up someone's forehead? Good lord!

One of my two jobs deals with working for the Rochester Mental Health Association. I deal with teens and young men who are abusive on this level. Trust me, there's a good possibility he'll do it again. Any man that will clock a girl half his size has a serious problem.

Unless Rihanna has decided to make 1960's and 70's Tina Turner her hero, she shouldn't go back with this moron.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

3 Replies

  • Justine Gonzalez 3 months ago I would love for her not to be seen...

I would love for her not to be seen with him in public either! Shoot, I don't necessarily want to have to address all the teenagers who are going to misunderstand the situation. You're right about him having a serious problem and I don't think they should get back together but like I said it's not our choice. I don't think people should boycott her music, which is what a lot of women are saying online, or anything like that because it's her rightful decision as a grown, informed woman. I saw the 20/20 interview last night (I know, Im super late) and she seems to be pretty conscious. If she has decided to go back with him then I will hope that she is also doing it consciously and not out of habit.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

2 Replies

  • Jeanne Vickery 3 months ago Justine, with your experience at th...

Justine, with your experience at the shelter you know that when the abused return to the abuser their decision is far more complex than 'conscious' or 'habit'. It takes time to cycle through the emotions, gain the strength, accept the fact it's not their fault, and make the final decision that enough is enough and leave.

The no tolerance discourse needs to be maintained by the 'outside' world to keep the pressure on society. It actually ensures a safer passage to safety for the abuse victims. Prior to 'no tolerance', abuse victims were ashamed to come forward and felt trapped with nowhere to go and no one to talk to.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

1 Replies

  • Justine Gonzalez 3 months ago In Rihanna's case, it has in f...

In Rihanna's case, it has in fact been three years--in which time she may or may not have cycled through her emotions, etc and perhaps she came to the final decision that she wants to work through her relationship with Chris Brown. My article is asking for the public to accept and respect her decision instead of villanize her for it--esp since none of us actually know the inner-workings of their relationship. I don't believe that the no tolerance discourse is the only way support victims of domestic violence--it has helped many women escape from situations of abuse and I'm not denying that. Of course, we wouldn't want to digress to the time before no tolerance but I believe we have the capacity to create a more encompassing approach to D.V

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
Join PolicyMic

What is PolicyMic?