Asian Space Race and NASA Privatization Will Help Us Reach Kepler-22b

10

Asian Space Race and NASA Privatization Will Help Us Reach Kepler-22b

On Monday, NASA announced the discovery of an Earth-like planet in the Kepler solar system that could possibly sustain life. Weeks prior, China announced the successful docking of its manned Shenzhou 8 craft with the recently-launched unmanned space laboratory Tiangong 1. As space travel captured the imaginations of people everywhere, Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey associate professor James Clay Moltz warned in the December 7th issue of Nature that Asia is in the midst of a space race that could turn into a geopolitical arms race.

However, Moltz should remember that the Cold War space race between the U.S. and Soviet Union resulted in moon landings, space stations, orbiting satellites, and a whole host of new technology. While space travel has become less of a national priority for the U.S. and Russia in subsequent decades, a new wave of corporate and governmental competition for space travel has emerged in recent years. Between the growing space race in Asia and trends towards privatized space travel in the U.S., the world is on the verge of new age of space exploration and technological advancement that will get us closer to travelling to Earth-like planets like Kepler-22b.

Unlike Europe and the U.S., Asian countries have not fully cooperated in developing their own space programs. How much China spends on its space program or the confirmed names of the Chinese "taikonauts" who have travelled into space is unknown. However, if trends hold, China's launch rate is set to surpass the U.S. and the country will have its own manned space station by 2020.

But it's not just China making advances in space travel. Japan and India are developing their own programs to explore the moon and launch crews into space.  Other countries like Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Taiwan, Bangladesh, Iran, Mongolia, and Pakistan are collaborating through the China-led Asia-Pacific Space Cooperation or the Japan-led Asia-Pacific Regional Space Agency Forum to develop their own programs. Many of these national space programs are focused on developing rockets to launch satellites into space, but could eventually lead to manned spaceflight.

With the end of space shuttle program, NASA has shifted to focus on helping private companies develop their own space programs. NASA has released rules about how private "space taxis" could qualify to dock with the International Space Station, and just announced on Friday that SpaceX will have the first privately-built spacecraft to do so next February. Companies like Virgin Galactic and Boeing will also compete to develop affordable space transportation options and lay the groundwork for future space logistics and tourism industries. There are also competitions like Google's Lunar X that offer prizes to competing space travel start-ups like Space IL.  Even independent groups in Europe like Copenhagen Suborbitals are developing their own proprietary space travel technologies.

NASA is meeting with Michigan companies to discuss supplying and leasing NASA technology, as well as newer start-ups like Made In Space, Inc., who want to use 3D printing to build spare parts for the ISS. NASA hasn't fully given up on its original role, as it will hold a press conference on December 15th to discuss its Space Launch System's advanced booster.

Traveling as far away as Kepler-22b is a daunting task. Although no one is in any position to travel 600 light years – U.S.'s Voyager 1 is only now leaving the solar system after 34 years in space – China, India, Japan and others are on track to develop space travel on the national scale just as NASA continues to coordinate efforts with private organizations developing their own space travel technology. Moltz has valid concerns about space militarization, but he should also keep in mind that the grand sum of multiple competing space travel programs will get us much closer to reaching distant worlds like Kepler-22b than no competition at all.

Photo Credit: Sweetie 187

10

Sign up to join the discussion

Reply to this article
view profile

Jason Prechtel

Jason Prechtel is the editor-in-chief of Culture Bore (www.culturebore.com), a blog about geopolitics, globalization, history, and more. He has a...

Most Mic'd Response

weekly-winner-headshot-fpo

Georgi Ivanov

That is the coolest article I've read on here in a long time. Kudos.

Watch the PolicyMic Video Join PolicyMic

The Discussion

"the grand sum of multiple competing space travel programs will get us much closer to reaching distant worlds like Kepler-22b than no competition at all."

I tried to read with enthusiasm until your closing remark, and then you totally lost me w/your conclusion, particularly that "much closer"!

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Great article! I really think the space sector really needs to make a push to colonize Mars. That is at least do-able with current technology and resources.

A permanent manned base will provide an excellent foothold for growing an interplanetary economy and will be a base for more scientific missions to the outer planets.

But going to Kepler 22b? Bit out there IMO, unless we can invent faster than light travel... which is unlikely right now.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Thanks Jason. Cool article. I wish we would re-purpose some of our defense spending in this country to an expanded space program. That investment in America's future will grow our technology base through increased R&D, and will inspire more kids to study science, math, and engineering - which IS good defense.

Whether or not we have the tech right now to go to the stars is irrelevant - we will never get there if we don't start.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

An Asian space race may be good for humanity's push past Earth orbit, but Kepler 22B? If we had the tech to build a space probe that could accelerate the whole way, it would be thousands of years before it arrived. Don't forget 587 years for the data to be returned to Earth. Let's be reasonable.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

1 Replies

  • Jason Prechtel 5 months ago Obviously, the technology to get to...

Obviously, the technology to get to Kepler-22b and back within a human lifespan doesn't exist yet. Maybe it won't exist within our lifetimes, but the seeds have been planted for sustained mass space travel, and we may be surprised by the scientific breakthroughs that emerge in the coming years.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Excellent article - Mic to you and thanks for all the links.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

That is the coolest article I've read on here in a long time. Kudos.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

1 Replies

  • Susan Kraykowski 5 months ago And an absolutely stunning picture,...

And an absolutely stunning picture, too!

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 5 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
Join PolicyMic

What is PolicyMic?