Lessons on Rebuilding from Detroit's Auto Industry and Sports Resurgence

28

Lessons on Rebuilding from Detroit's Auto Industry and Sports Resurgence

Detroit is enjoying a renaissance this year. Chrysler and GM have begun to pay off considerable chunks of their bailout receipts and all Big Three auto manufacturers Ford, GM, and Chrysler  posted profits in the third quarter. In sports, the Tigers made it to the ALCS with AL Cy Young and MVP Justin Verlander, and the Lions have a chance to hand reigning champs Green Bay its first loss of the year. The city’s morale has been buoyed by an influx of young entrepreneurs, eliciting comparisons to Brooklyn’s hipster-friendly Williamsburg by the New York Times.

After limping on life support for years, the Motor City’s auto industry and sports teams finds themselves in this unlikely situation due to outside intervention with savvy use of assistance leading to better product on the field and the assembly line and renewed faith in Detroit.

Detroit’s struggles began long before GM and Chrysler needed bailouts to stay alive. As American auto sales declined in the face of rising Asian autos and union pensions bogged down profit margins, American auto slowly walked to its apparent doom. Chapter 11 bankruptcy allowed GM and Chrysler to restructure their debt and pensions with the help of bankruptcy attorneys, but without the government’s bailout and an improved line of cars, both would be out of gas.

The bailout remains one of the most controversial decisions in recent current events. Many questioned whether the Big Three were beyond repair. Detroit’s reputation led Gary Ackerman (D-NY) to challenge automakers to “sell cars that people want.” Detroit responded to the challenge, creating cars that for once surpassed their foreign competitors.

In 2010, the Big Three outperformed Asian brands in JD Power’s ratings for the first time in its history. And buyers are noticing too. At the end of 2008, when the bailouts were being negotiated, 15% of Americans reported they would not buy an American car. By March 2010, that number was down to 6%.

With the improved product line, Chrysler has been able to pay off most of its loans to the government as well as Fiat, which helped finance the second bailout. Detroit auto’s resurgence mirrors the Lions’ path to success.

The Lions, an NFL bottom-dweller for most of this decade, have benefited from the redistributive NFL draft. In order to increase parity amongst teams, the NFL rewards the worst teams in the league with the highest picks in its annual draft.

Today’s starting quarterback, Matt Stafford, leading rusher Jahvid Best, defensive phenom Ndamukong Suh, receiver Calvin Johnson, and tight end Brandon Pettigrew (who was acquired when former No. 7 pick Roy Williams was dealt to the Cowboys all came to the Lions through first round draft picks. Three — Stafford, Johnson, and Suh — were top five picks.

The group has played a critical role in the Lion’s resurgence, evidencing the effects of redistributive policies. But even with help from the draft, the Lions would not be where they are without coach Jim Schwartz who has brought a hardnosed attitude to the team that has brought discipline and structure to the team.

Jim Schwartz started coaching in 2009, and though he didn’t see immediate wins, he preached discipline in every aspect of the game which forged an identity for this young team. Last season, the team didn't give up in close games despite a losing record, and now the Lions are poised to make the playoffs for the first time.

Detroit’s rebirths on the field and in the maunfacturing plan stem from hard work, smart decisions, and good management, but they owe a great debt to outside intervention as well. Without Schwartz's disciplined coaching and a revamped product line, Detroit would still be in shambles.

Photo Credit: Dave Hogg

28

Sign up to join the discussion

Reply to this article
view profile

Nathaniel Reid

A midwesterner in the east coast, I am interested in a wide variety of topics, particularly international-Asian economics and the Supreme Court. ...

Most Mic'd Response

weekly-winner-headshot-fpo

Jon Awbrey

Inflationary Mic-ro-eco-no-Mics

Watch the PolicyMic Video Join PolicyMic

The Discussion

  • No longer with us
  • 5 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 5 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

2 Replies

  • Jon Awbrey 6 months ago Common Dreams • “Corporate Coup...

  • Jon Awbrey 6 months ago Common Dreams • “Corporate Coup...

  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Why didn't the gov't bailout Blockbuster? Sure Netflix had a far better business model, but think of all the jobs that could have been saved propping up a zombie company.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

8 Replies

  • Jon Awbrey 6 months ago Because entertainment is not a defe...

  • Nathaniel Reid 6 months ago Along with Jon's point. The Bi...

  • Jon Awbrey 6 months ago All our favorite Neo-Con-Libertaria...

  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Along with Jon's point. The Big Three basically hold up a (then very hard-up) city, providing careers for people. Blockbuster's demise is more dispersed throughout the country, and I would be willing to bet that a larger portion of auto workers rely on their job to provide for others than Blockbuster.

As it is, the jobs were saved with very little cost to taxpayers--in my opinion, a smart business rule by the government.

  • Mic this! 2
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

What about the airlines? I would think they provide a pretty critical function. Is it really fair for the federal govt to be picking winners and losers by some arbitrary basis?

I am also not buying the notion that gm and chrysler were going to close their doors w/o a bailout. Plenty of companies go through normal bankruptcy channels and come out leaner and more prosperous. And the cost to tax payers is significant, tens of billions of dollars.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

I understand why you might be concerned about government intervention, the picking winners and losers argument. A lot of the right these days is really big into their right to fail, as well as succeed. But, if the loans are paid off--meaning tax payers actually make money off of it--and jobs are saved in the process, not to mention an entire metropolitan area's economy, why get mad because government intervened? The intervention benefited the lives of many auto workers with little taxpayer support.

  • Mic this! 2
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

With regards to whether GM and Chrysler were going to close, what evidence do you have to the contrary? Is it just general skepticism of the self-serving nature of the bailout or have you seen their healthy balance sheets?

I understand why the bailout is unpopular. No one likes to see the rich propped up by the government while the poor have their homes foreclosed on. But the bailout looks like it saved many jobs with little taxpayer burden, which leads me to call it a success, its repulsiveness notwithstanding.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

I could ask you the same question. Just b/c GM and Chrysler told us they were going to close w/o the infusion of cash doesn't make it so. Obviously their balance sheets weren't "healthy" since they were on the verge of bankruptcy. But that doesn't mean they couldn't have filed b-ruptcy like any other company. If you recall, the argument against b-ruptcy was that nobody would want to buy a car from a company that declares b-ruptcy. That was rubbish. People fly on b-rupt airlines and the car makers ultimately filed b-ruptcy anyway.

I think you're dreaming if you believe the tax payers are going to make $ on this deal. Most expect us to lose tens of billions. Not exactly chicken feed.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Making a loan at below market interest rates is a cost-the government took on a significant amount of risk that the private sector deemed unreasonable. Considering the fact that the entire financial crisis could be summed up as the economy taking on a greater than optimal amount of risk through poor loans, why would these bailouts fix that?

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Why did the auto execs need a Congressman to tell them to sell cars that people want? Did they not have enough common sense to know that business is all about selling products people want? The US auto industry has been ailing for decades; why did it take a gov't bailout to make the Big Three wake up and smell the gas? I hope Washington doesn't plan on bailing out every stupidly mismanaged industry in the economy...

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

I read the hyper-linked Bloomberg article under the line without government bailout but it does not mention how a government bailout saved GM and Chrysler.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

And how much better off would Ford be without the bailouts?

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Why couldn't GM and Chrysler have filed for bankruptcy w/o federal bailout money?

  • Mic this! 2
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

4 Replies

  • Nathaniel Reid 6 months ago They could have filed the Chapter 1...

  • Nathaniel Reid 6 months ago They could have filed the Chapter 1...

  • Nathaniel Reid 6 months ago They could have filed the Chapter 1...

They could have filed the Chapter 11 restructuring without bailout money, but Chrysler and GM needed cash to continue operating, not just the cost cutting provided by bankruptcy. The bailout provided the funds to keep GM and Chrysler in business and keep Detroit running.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

They could have filed the Chapter 11 restructuring without bailout money, but Chrysler and GM needed cash to continue operating, not just the cost cutting provided by bankruptcy. The bailout provided the funds to keep GM and Chrysler in business and keep Detroit running.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

They could have filed the Chapter 11 restructuring without bailout money, but Chrysler and GM needed cash to continue operating, not just the cost cutting provided by bankruptcy. The bailout provided the funds to keep GM and Chrysler in business and keep Detroit running.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Btw, it doesn't seem GM is quite the success story you paint.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/driveon/post/2011/11/general-motors-gm-third-quarter-earnings-billion-/1

GM stock would need to be at $53 a share for taxpayers to break even on the nearly $50 billion GM bailout.

It's currently at $22, down from $33 at the time of its IPO. In other words, unless the stock more than doubles, tax payers on the hook.

The latest news on the Volt bursting into flames isn't going to help much.

Here's another take on the bailout:

http://www.forbes.com/2011/06/21/bailout-autoworkers-unions.html

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

4 Replies

  • Nathaniel Reid 6 months ago Michigan is finally returning to th...

  • Alex Ellingboe 6 months ago Haha someone gave you a mic for tha...

  • Jon Awbrey 6 months ago Inflationary Mic-ro-eco-no-Mics...

Michigan is finally returning to the limelight. And State has played well too. Basically, Michigan sports is having a good year.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Haha someone gave you a mic for that

  • Mic this! 2
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 3
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Though today's announcement is no good for the blue and maize. Meyer will prove tough competition on the field and recruiting.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
Join PolicyMic

What is PolicyMic?