GOP Could Sway Muslim Vote If It Weren't For Hateful Rhetoric

55

GOP Could Sway Muslim Vote If It Weren't For Hateful Rhetoric

Earlier this month Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) reminded us all of the “threat” of Muslims bringing Sharia law into the United States. She said it was troubling to see “some United States justices bringing in Sharia law,” and that Muslims want to “usurp” the Constitution. Earlier this summer, Herman Cain declared that he would not appoint a Muslim to his administration, and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich echoed concerns about Muslims in government. Reasonable scrutiny is one thing, but this type of manufactured fear scares people and alienates Muslims from the Republican Party. 

The truth is, though, that the Muslim community in America is actually a natural fit for the GOP. As a matter of political strategy, the GOP could pick up a substantial portion of the Muslim vote without having to make any substantial policy shifts.

Many American Muslims are new immigrants or first and second generation Americans, hailing from South Asia, the Middle East, and Northern Africa. They are people who came to the U.S. largely empty-handed, in search of a better life. Self-reliance and personal responsibility make up the core of these individuals and their families. The notion of a government safety net is as foreign to them as the Kardashians are.  

Now consider that one in every four American Muslim households earns over $100,000 per year. Another plus for Republicans, as you’d expect that lower taxes, the cornerstone of conservative fiscal policy, would resonate well with them.

Remnants of their own cultures also play to Republican strengths. Many Muslims in America come from regions where there is a strong emphasis on the value of family. They want a certain degree of autonomy when it comes to how they raise their children, with 84% supporting school choice. They’re unlikely to be compelled to extend marriage rights and are overwhelmingly pro-life.

In fact, in 2000, President George W. Bush won 70% of the American Muslim vote.

Of course, the usual explanation for Muslims no longer voting Republican has to do with foreign policy, particularly with respect to the Middle East. But if you look closely, neither the GOP nor the Democratic Party is really a winner for most Muslims on these issues. If Muslims didn’t like Bush’s foreign policy, surely they are frustrated by the Obama administration’s foreign policy strategies, especially drone strikes and our involvement in Libya. Muslims that had issues with these foreign policy decisions may see both parties as equally hawkish. And as far as the Middle East goes, Israel is an American ally. Both parties generally support Israel, so it’s a wash for Muslims set on supporting Palestine.

Despite the instinctive alignment of a substantial number of Muslims with conservative ideals, in 2008 about 90% of American Muslim voters chose to vote for President Barack Obama. 

So what is it that has alienated Muslims from the GOP?

Rhetoric that perpetuates a fear of Islam and average Muslims.

It’s the comments like those from Bachmann, Cain, and Gingrich. To regain the American Muslim vote, Republicans need not make any policy concessions whatsoever; all they have to do is stop spewing hateful rhetoric.

And other Republicans, like New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, are already realizing that this rhetoric is political poison. See, there’s a growing perception among independents and left-leaning Americans that conservatives today are too extreme. This type of nonsense about Muslims in America wanting to take over the government plays right into that narrative. But confronting this rhetoric retorts that perception and may make Republicans more competitive in a general election.

Of course, there are people within the GOP who believe Islam and Muslims are the enemy and don’t belong here. And if Republican politicians start defecting from their cause, there is a chance these people may drop their support.

But it won’t hurt much. They’re a small group. And their cause is a dying one. They are going to be left behind. Like all other causes that stem from hate, their efforts will be washed away over time and into the history books.

Besides, what are they going to do… vote for Obama?

Photo Credit: david_shankbone

55

Sign up to join the discussion

Reply to this article
view profile

Khurram Dara

Khurram is the author of The Crescent Directive: An essay on improving the image of Islam in America. He graduated from Emory University where...

Most Mic'd Response

weekly-winner-headshot-fpo

Emily Ballard

Every time I hear about stories like this it saddens me to think that we live in "the land of the free" when certain racial/religious groups continue to be outcast by certain politicians. The Republican candidates should be happy to have muslim support- that population in America continues to grow. They should not be kept from government just because of religion. Just a bit hypocritical.

Watch the PolicyMic Video Join PolicyMic

The Discussion

As problematic as it is to talk about "Muslims" as a monolithic community, are you sure that they oppose the redistribution of wealth? Giving alms to the needy is, after all, one of the five pillars of Islam.

I also think there is a substantial difference in the way Obama and Bush have dealt with the Middle East. Obama provided assistance to a popular revolution in Libya in order to prevent a massacre. Bush launched two full-scale invasions resulting in two of the longest wars in US history. The difference in rhetoric was also extreme, which is important to note given the argument of the piece.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

4 Replies

  • Khurram Dara 6 months ago yeah I agree, I wanted a paragraph ...

  • Khurram Dara 6 months ago sorry, ran out of space--meant to s...

  • Gregor Nazarian 6 months ago Although the point about generaliza...

yeah I agree, I wanted a paragraph in the beginning qualifying that the American Muslim community is so diverse that it can difficult to generalize.

It is true that one of the five pillars is giving to the needy. I'm not sure I accept your premise here though. The fact that one of Islam's core tenets is giving to the poor wouldn't be determinative of what party a Muslim chose. Conservatives aren't opposed to helping the poor. It's a question of whether it's the government's role to collect funds and redistribute them as they see fit, helping those in need by channeling these funds into various government programs.

good point on foreign policy--im not sure average voters look w/ that much depth though--in general terms, still in wars

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

sorry, ran out of space--meant to say the article would have been too long if i included the qualifying paragraph

and that i think average muslim voters see foreign policy the same, we're still in the several middle east/arab countries...but you're right there is a substantive difference in foreign policy i agree with that.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Although the point about generalization is well-taken (we agree here), I'm challenging the idea that American Muslims would tend toward the Republican party line on taxes and government redistribution of wealth.

There is a tension between the emphasis on "self-reliance and personal responsibility" you mentioned and a commitment to helping those in need. Consider Herman Cain's "If you don't have a job and you're not rich, blame yourself." The question is whether the less fortunate should be criticized or assisted, and I think that the importance Islam places on alms-giving lends strength to the latter.

Also, "a government safety net" is not a foreign concept to many Muslim immigrants, considering the history of socialism in the Arab world.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Also, I understand that the requirements of a religion don't always count when it comes to politics. Jesus spoke a great deal about helping the poor, but there are plenty of Christians who either ignore that message or simply believe the government shouldn't be entrusted with that task (which is I believe how you characterize the conservative position, unless I'm mistaken).

I'm not looking at the idea as a concept in a religious text, but as an important cultural norm. While you argue "Self-reliance and personal responsibility make up the core of these individuals" because they are immigrants, I would suggest that some of them may also be bringing a sense of responsibility toward the poor that would make them sympathetic to the Democrats.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

The biggest spewer of anti-Muslim rhetoric is Rep. Peter King from New York, who routinely holds useless radicalization hearings that only serve to give him his fifteen minutes of political infamy. He is a modern day Joseph McCarthy.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

It's unfortunate that so many seem to wish to confuse rational responses with hatred. I have watched the rise of radical Islam for over forty years now and would suggest that Muslims drop the "blame others" that is such a prevalent theme in not only their rhetoric, but also in their inner most thoughts. I could go into why this is so, but it is not really the topic of the article.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

17 Replies

  • Richard Headrick 6 months ago That being said, it is true that Mu...

  • Khurram Dara 6 months ago scrutinizing Muslims is one thing--...

  • Khurram Dara 6 months ago i dont think all American Muslims h...

That being said, it is true that Muslims would seem to be a natural constituency of the Republican Party except for a few minor details. Republicans, by and large, continue to be commited to a system of Human Rights that Muslims, when tasked with protecting those Rights, have failed to defend at every opportunity.
Even if one looks at the Palestinian Question one has to ask, other than religion, why do American Muslims oppose Israel?

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

scrutinizing Muslims is one thing--saying they should be barred from working in the government is rather extreme.

but i agree with the "blame others" point. We've been advocating taking our own action. Read my article entitled "our part in signs like 'bomb making next door'" about our (Muslims) responsibility in all this.

http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial-page/from-our-readers/another-voice/article426035.ece

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

i dont think all American Muslims have a problem w/ Israel, just a lot that are pro palestine, not sure it's a pretty complex situation

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

I accepted your invitation and found the piece to be much more in line with what I might suggest. The unfortunate thing is that I have seen a trend much more in the opposite direction. Ironically, as many of my friends have aged they seem to have become more radical, not less.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

"Even if one looks at the Palestinian Question one has to ask, other than religion, why do American Muslims oppose Israel? "

Richard, have you truly considered what the answer might be? The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is about far, far more than religion, and taking your own question as a starting point for inquiry could be worthwhile, I think. It's not nearly so simple as Jews hating Muslims and Muslims hating Jews.

Just one caveat: Objecting to some of a country's policies is not the same as opposing a country, full stop (i.e. wanting to annihilate that country).

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Yes, I have considered what the answer may be, and religion seems to be the answer that fits. Why else would a peasant in Pakistan care about what happened in Israel?

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Whether you're asking about American Muslims or a peasant in Pakistan, the answer would probably be the same: a sense of compassion and sympathy for the suffering and dispossession of the Palestinians. It's not the only part of the story, but it's a part that should be pretty easy to recognize.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Not really. One might suggest similar compassion and sympathy for the suffereing and dispossesion of the Jews. Frankly, I don't see a similar outcry from the peasants for the Kurds, the Armenians, the Sikhs, etc. Religion is the connection. In the history of the world, other than Jordan, there has never been a "Palestine".

I would, however, like your permission to ask you a couple of questions.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Tarek..Thank you for your interest, but the topic is primarily American Muslims, with Palestine being only an example of where religion takes precidence over country. Are you in agreement that it is for religious reasons that Muslims oppose Israel?

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Not unlike Pakistan which was formed at the same time as an Islamic State, resulting in huge dislocations for millions of people, major loss of life and property, and partition of a similar nature.
At the time of independence borders were redrawn throughout the Middle East. Opposition to Israel, certainly by Muslims, is on religious grounds. I see few Muslims demonstrating against the lack of religious freedom in Saudi Arabia.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

It wasn't at the time of independence that borders in the Middle East were redrawn (except for Israel), yet in colonialisation. The basis of every single Muslim who opposes Israel is religion? So a family who were kicked out of their home in 1967 and forced to be refugees in foreign lands only oppose Israel due to the fact they are Muslims? There's political, social and human rights grounds too that could be reasons for Muslims to oppose Israel

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Ben...although I believe I could make a pretty good case supporting even the universality of which you speak, the main thrust of my argument concerned those who were not directly affected and thus I request that you do so as well. Having said that, I would be interested in your response to that assertion. In other words, for the moment, not to include the "Palestinians" themselves.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Every time I hear about stories like this it saddens me to think that we live in "the land of the free" when certain racial/religious groups continue to be outcast by certain politicians. The Republican candidates should be happy to have muslim support- that population in America continues to grow. They should not be kept from government just because of religion. Just a bit hypocritical.

  • Mic this! 6
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

@Kurram you've hit the nail on the head I think. A lot of the extreme anti-muslim arguments coming from the Republicans are falling flat. Frankly, blacks and hispanics should be voting repub. also, as they tend to be more religious, but we alienate them too.

  • Mic this! 4
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

@max well I don't think Romney pretends, I think he is a conservative, he just doesn't paint himself as a tea partier or a far right candidate. I don't think the impact will be the Muslim vote itself, as much as it will be an increase in independents who see GOP candidates as conservative, but not extreme when rhetoric like this changes

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

3 Replies

  • Max Markham 6 months ago I didn't mean to say I don...

  • Khurram Dara 6 months ago i know what you're saying. to...

  • Ethan Case 6 months ago Not to stray even further off-topic...

I didn't mean to say I don't think he's conservative... I just don't believe he is AS conservative as he acts in these quasi-fascist GOP debates as of late. It's hard for me to believe that a former governor of Massachusetts who established the template of Obama's healthcare reform can be so conservative as to say that he no longer supports a woman's right to choose, etc.

But yes that makes sense about the anti-Muslim image vs. actually impacting a Muslim vote.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

i know what you're saying. to be fair, he's got a pretty solid federalism argument on his healthcare plan, in terms of states' rights, and the individual mandate was actually championed by the heritage foundation i think. the national review did a good piece in 2008 on romneys conservatism--and they endorsed him, and they're are a pretty conservative publication to start. i wont buy into the premise that someone like cain is more conservative because he says bigoted things and has no record whatsoever (which no one seems to talk about). but yeah, i know what you mean in terms of romney in relation to the others at these debates

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Not to stray even further off-topic, but I can't help but get the feeling that Romney keeps mentally /facepalming at all these debates when some of the clowns our party put up against him open their mouths. And I think he's silently thanking G-d that no one likes Huntsman, because Huntsman and Paul are probably his only real competition.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

This is a really interesting take. In a post 9/11 world I would never in a million years have associated the muslim vote with the GOP, but the 70% for GWB in '00 statistic makes a lot of sense. As does the 90% for Obama in '08. Do you think, after so many years of hate-filled rhetoric from many Republican figureheads, it is possible for the GOP to right its image in time for the 2012 election? If/when Romney starts realising he has to stop pretending to be conservative because he is the likely nominee, do you think its possible for him to reenergise a larger Muslim base in time for the election? And if so, how crucial do you think a majority Muslim vote has the potential to be in a general election? Really fascinating take.

  • Mic this! 3
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

5 Replies

  • Ethan Case 6 months ago The joke is a goofy picture of GWB ...

  • Ethan Case 6 months ago Not sure there's enough Muslim...

  • Jake Horowitz 6 months ago Khurram, how large is the Muslim vo...

The joke is a goofy picture of GWB with the quote 'miss me yet?' but as far as GOPers go. Yes, we do. He was far more moderated in his views than the current batch, but still had street cred with the christian right. Unfortunately he wasn't loud enough and people listened to bachmann and coulter

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Not sure there's enough Muslims in this country yet to make a real difference. Though their prevalence in the midwest might turn some key swing states if its close. They won't make a difference in NY/NJ though. We're all blue all the time.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Khurram, how large is the Muslim voting bloc in the country, and is it concentrated enough in one swing state (like the Cuban community in Florida) to make a meaningful electoral difference for either Obama or the GOP candidate?

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

It's rather small, I'd say about 1 million and that's generous. For now it remains untapped, I don't think American Muslims are particularly active.

The real benefits here for the GOP are fundraising, and the ability to appear less extreme (by casting away this sort of anti-Muslim sentiment)

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

but i really have no idea how many registered Muslim voters there are or turnout rates

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Christie's courage in supporting Sohail Mohammed, who was an integral part of strengthening ties between law enforcement and the Muslim community post-9/11 was an honorable act and will distinguish him in history. Most other politicians lack the courage to face down the angry face of ignorance.

  • Mic this! 4
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

@warner take a look at the work I do. Ive got a piece coming in the commentator about how Muslims need to handle the problem. This was a strategy piece, relax. I agree that reasonable scrutiny is only natural.

  • Mic this! 6
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

1 Replies

  • Susan Kraykowski 6 months ago Khurram, don't worry about the...

Khurram, don't worry about the blowhards and the haters. If someone doesn't take the time to read your profile - or leaves his/her own profile blank - he/she isn't worth your time.

  • Mic this! 4
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

So true, the hateful rhetoric of the far right is driving many away. Unfortunately, that's how they built their current house - through hate and fear. Hate and fear are all they have right now because the left has the populous ideals and the true morality.

As long as the Republican Party relies on rabble like Limbaugh and Hannity to drive the rank and file, hate and fear will always be their only option. Unfortunately Joe Lunchbucket, the lightly educated rank and file of the far right, is unable to see the deceptions involved and so is easily swayed by fear mongering. He's also been attuned to it by attending church every Sunday. Fear God, fear Satan, fear Muslims, fear tomorrow, fear science, fear thought.

  • Mic this! 3
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Once again we see a Muslim pretending that everyone else is at fault for Radical Islam. How about you combat the bad actors in your own community before pointing fingers at everyone else? But besides that, what, exactly, do you expect from Americans when so many Mosques are funded by radical Wahabbis from Saudi Arabia teaching hate for America? Should that all just be ignored? Like I said, cleanup your own back yard first, then let's talk.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

5 Replies

  • Jake Horowitz 6 months ago Warner, your comment is bizarre as ...

  • Warner Todd Huston 6 months ago What he is saying is that the react...

  • Jake Horowitz 6 months ago Nowhere in this piece does Khurram ...

Warner, your comment is bizarre as I'm not seeing how it at all relates to Khurram's article. He's discussing Muslim voting patterns and whether the American Muslim community should vote for Dems or the GOP. How you got from that to telling Khurram to "cleanup his own back yard" is beyond me, and more importantly, misses the crux of his piece. This piece is in no way related to mosques or "radical Islam." You've made some very thoughtful comments on the site, and I respect your opinions and admire your eagerness to participate, but here, I think you have overstepped.

  • Mic this! 4
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

What he is saying is that the reaction to Radical Islam is wrong, it is ginned up by Republicans, GOP fear of radical Islam is illegitimate and causing them the loss of the Muslim vote. That is what he's saying. He obviously begins his entire piece based on the premise that reaction to radical Islam is wrong and that it is the GOP that has to accommodate it. That assumption underlies his entire piece. I can't see how you could doubt that.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Nowhere in this piece does Khurram say anything about condoning "radical Islam," Warner. Are you actually characterizing all American Muslims as radical? That's unfair. More, that's the kind of behavior Cain and Bachmann engage in, when they claim that ALL Muslims want to "usurp" the constitution, and that no Muslim should be hired in government because they are all radical. The author is saying that GOP reaction to Muslims as a whole, stereotyping them all as radical, is wrong. Moreover, he's not telling the GOP they have to "accommodate" anything, but rather, that there's a big electoral opportunity out there if they soften their rhetoric.

  • Mic this! 3
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

I did not say all Muslims are radical. But it seems clear to me that this piece is based on the assumption that Republicans are at fault for everything and Muslims are clean as the driven snow. But, I guess we will have to agree to disagree.

  • Mic this! 0
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Jake, the article speaks of "hateful rhetoric" and that rhetoric in turn is driven by the specter (real or imagined) of Islamic extremism, which in turn is driven by Wahhabi $$ (a factor here) and Deobandi Madrasahs (not a factor here, although they were responsible - largely - for 9/11).

There is a connection between Warner's observation and the article. Don't act so shocked or offended. You might try brushing up on your current history.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

You are correct in your thesis, Khurram. I also believe that American Muslims are by-and-large a "natural" demographic fit with most of the traditional Republican party values. As the GOP was the first to glom onto the use of demographic analysis and uses it in very sophisticated ways; it mystifies me why they have essentially written off this largely friendly demographic when they need all the help they can get.

It does behoove everyone involved - and especially Muslim-American voters - to remember that the Democratic tent is large, welcoming, inclusive and tolerant. We don't always agree with each other - sometimes loudly - but we do hang together and move forward. No litmus test allowed.

  • Mic this! 3
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

7 Replies

  • Tarek Mostafa 6 months ago Maybe fear mongering is more effici...

  • Susan Kraykowski 6 months ago Maybe, Tarek...but fearmongering do...

  • Tarek Mostafa 6 months ago Anyway the GOP is being reduced to ...

  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 3
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Maybe, Tarek...but fearmongering doesn't bring in the new votes the GOP needs to prosper into the future. Listen to me! I'm a Democrat giving advice to the Republicans...sad times indeed. I ought to keep my mouth closed and let them self-destruct.

  • Mic this! 3
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
  • No longer with us
  • 6 months ago

This account has been disabled.

  • Mic this! 3
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

That may be correct, Tarek, although it shouldn't be.

  • Mic this! 2
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Have at it, Susan. Please!!

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Excellent point, Tarek, re: the diversification of USA. The GOP will indeed have to modify both their perspective and their message in order to remain viable. Otherwise they will push themselves into obscurity.

I'm hopeful that this election might see the emergence of GOP candidates who move in that direction, and so on as the years march on. That certainly needs to happen.

  • Mic this! 2
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!

Interesting, Susan, although I'm not so sure that there is no donkey litmus test. Even if it's only the negative assertion "I'm not a Republican" (rather than the positive assertion of "I'm a liberal"). There's a lot of GOP hating and/or derision going around, not all of it unwarranted.

  • Mic this! 1
  • Reply
char limit
Please wait before posting another comment to this article. Thanks!
Join PolicyMic

What is PolicyMic?